Content deleted Content added
→Design: Reply |
BrokenSegue (talk | contribs) →Design: Reply |
||
Line 32:
:::::::Despite all these snags, I don't want to give up after we've come this far. My impulse is to plunge ahead with the current implementation. This would also allow us to use the tracking category to see how many articles <em>would</em> have errors if we hadn't checked for those, to get a sense of the scale of that problem. If there are complaints, we'll roll back the implementation. Slightly longer-term, we can work toward improving the updating algorithm and fetching the total view count. Once those things are in place and we've minimized the errors, we'll be able to deprecate all the existing parameters around stats updating, which would make the infobox's code a lot simpler.
:::::::How does that sound? Sorry for the super long reply haha. And please lmk if any of the above is confusing. Cheers, <span style="color:#AAA"><small>{{u|</small><span style="border-radius:9em;padding:0 5px;background:#088">[[User:Sdkb|<span style="color:#FFF">'''Sdkb'''</span>]]</span><small>}}</small></span> <sup>[[User talk:Sdkb|'''talk''']]</sup> 19:33, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
::::::::I think actually that **is** what you proposed (it says "update other items once per year"). My reading of the RfC is that we are allowed to update once a year for each account. I just don't have the bot setup to do that. I can do a big run this weekend to update all the old channels. [[User:BrokenSegue|''B''roken]][[User talk:BrokenSegue|''S''egue]] 06:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
|