Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attachment disorder: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Attachment disorder]]: delete |
|||
Line 9:
*'''KEEP''' The article has been though many edits and revisions and is an important subject in Psychology and mental health treatment, as evidenced by the many citations and professional peer-reviewed references. Furthermore, the talk page does show that the material that was considered copyrighted was used with the permission of Dr. Becker-Weidman. There has not been any content disputes is quite some time and the various editors appear to have reached a consensus that is reflected in the current article. <font color="Red">[[user:DPeterson|DPeterson]]</font><sup>[[User talk:DPeterson|talk]]</sup> 13:27, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
*'''speedy keep''' No copyright violation exists. From the archived page the hold of the copyright stated, <blockquote>The material previously deleted was not "stolen" as it is covered under fair use provisions of the copyright code. But, more to the point, I hold the copyright to that article and I am allowed to use it as I see fit...although I have edited it some here. Dr. Art 22:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)</blockquote><font color="DarkGreen">[[user:JonesRD|JonesRD]]</font><sub>[[User talk:JonesRD|talk]]</sub> 16:11, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', not because of the copyvio which isn't one as said above. The copyright-owner has given permission to use the text which makes me inherently sceptical, because of [[WP:COI]]. As the nominator puts it : ''this article is written in a non-encyclopedic tone, and advocates a specific pro-Attachment POV in many places.''
In addition to that: Attachment disorder is a term that borders on neologism and original research. The term is in use, but many times it is used short for [[Reactive Attachment Disorder]], which really exists as a medical diagnosis. Attachment disorder can also be used as a pov term to describe [[Attachment theory]]. (The findings of attachment theory are usually described as attachment ''styles'', not attachment ''disorders''.) Since articles on [[Reactive Attachment Disorder]] and [[Attachment theory]] do exist I think this article is redundant.--[[User:DorisH|DorisH]] 18:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
| |||