Talk:Block scheduling: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:57, 16 January 2022

Revision as of 22:06, 24 March 2023

Line 10:

This article seems to be anti-block scheduling. There is very little support for block scheduling. Under "Effectiveness" there is no support for block scheduling. There should be both sides under this, probably split in two sub-sections, one fro pros and one for cons. [[User:Holycow958|Holycow958]] 21:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

:It does need two sides...(but block schedules suck anyways ;)) --<fontspan colorstyle="color: green"; font-family: face="Berling Antiqua;">hello, i'm a [[User:Member|<fontspan colorstyle="color: orange;">member</fontspan>]]</fontspan> | [[User talk:Member|<fontspan colorstyle="color: grey;">talk to me!</fontspan>]] 23:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

:I agree, it seems very one-sided, anti-block scheduling. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/66.31.47.44|66.31.47.44]] ([[User talk:66.31.47.44|talk]]) 01:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

I also agree. This article article is clearly against block scheduling!--[[Special:Contributions/98.220.124.133|98.220.124.133]] ([[User talk:98.220.124.133|talk]]) 00:27, 1 January 2009 (UTC)