Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Java/Things you can do/to do: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:57, 31 March 2022

Revision as of 21:08, 25 March 2023

Line 51:

:::<nowiki>}}</nowiki><br/>

:::<nowiki>{{to_do}}</nowiki><br/>

:* <fontspan colorstyle="color: red;">c) To that end, I did the first simulated test on [[Talk:J2EE application|<span style="color: red;">Talk:J2EE application</span>]], you can see the stats matrix [[Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Java_articles_by_quality_statistics|<span style="color: red;">here</span>]], it's great!</fontspan>

:* d) Furthermore, after that we could put the {{tl|Compu-stub}} tag in all Java-related article pages NOT already quality-rated and ask [[User:TinucherianBot|TinucherianBot]] to auto-assess on the talk pages; that would give us a base Quality rating to start with.<br/>-- [[User:Alainr345|<span style="display:inline-block; position:relative; top:20px; font-family:Times; color:#4590ff; font-size:small;"><u><i>&nbsp;Alain&nbsp; R 3 4 5&nbsp;</i></u><br/><sup style="color:#ffb000;">Techno-Wiki-Geek</sup></span>]] 02:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)<br/><br/>

Line 69:

== 6 ==

Not sure where to ask about this, but if you look at how I've changed [[MIDlet]] you'll see I got rid of the huge chunk of Java code. I think, for instance [[Xlet]] ought to get the same treatment, we shouldn't just have code in an article, that belongs in a book or howto. At the moment I'm getting on with the cleanup of articles that require citations and references, but it's slow going. Also, s there a general discussion page for this project? '''<span style="color:#aaa">—</span> [[User:M3tainfo|<span style="color:#0055dd">M3TA</span>]]<span style="color:#aaa">(</span>[[User_talk:M3tainfo|<span style="color:#0022aa">info</span>]]<span style="color:#aaa">) @</span>''' 07:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC) (copied from User_talk:M3tainfo)

:As far as code is concerned, I agree with you... up to a point. Looking at that Xlet article, I think the interface list would be 'bookish' (I'm not EN so pardon any crazy neologisms I could come up with...), while the example would be the one to keep. Is that your feeling? More generally speaking, you'll observe that there are Java articles with FAR more code than that and I think the difficulty in that eventual 'cleanup' would be to keep the worthwhile efforts of over-enthusiastic Wikipedians somewhere. Accessorily, there IS a Java Wikibook (however imperfect it is), the link of which is now at the end of the Java Portal. --<fontspan facestyle="Times" color=": #4590ff"; font-family: Times; font-size="2: small;">[[User:Alainr345|<span style="color: #4590ff;"><i>AlainR345</i></span>]][[User_talk:Alainr345|<fontspan colorstyle="color: #ffb000;">^{Techno-Wiki-Geek}</fontspan>]]</fontspan> 19:10, 3 March 2010 (UTC)