Comparison of HTML5 and Flash: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:34, 29 January 2023

Revision as of 19:53, 27 March 2023

Line 118:

| {{n/a}}

| {{yes}}, implemented in most browsers, for system and custom fonts

| {{yes}}, in most cases^{<span style="font-weight:normal">{{noteefn|b|2name=note2}}</span>}

|-

! Text [[tab stop]]s

Line 135:

| {{depends|No, but text fields can be arranged into a grid}}

|-

! Linked text frames^{<span style="font-weight:normal">{{noteefn|a|1name=note1}}</span>}

| {{depends|{{As of|2016}}, two specifications compete: CSS Regions<ref>{{cite web|publisher=W3C|title=CSS Regions|url=http://www.w3.org/TR/css-regions-1/|access-date=August 24, 2015}}</ref> and CSS Overflow<ref>{{cite web|publisher=W3C|title=CSS Overflow|url=https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overflow/|access-date=August 24, 2015}}</ref>}}

| {{depends|With CSS Regions, supported by Safari, IE11 and Edge}}<ref>{{cite web|publisher=Can I Use...|title=CSS Regions|url=http://caniuse.com/css-regions|access-date=February 12, 2016}}</ref>

Line 227:

===Notes===

{{notelist|refs=

#{{noteefn|name=note1|a}}Allows text to overflow into other text boxes, useful for [[desktop publishing]].}}

#{{noteefn|name=note2|b}}Static text created via [[Adobe Flash Professional|Flash editor]] is automatically embedded and anti-aliased. Text fields created via ActionScript need fonts to be manually embedded for anti-aliasing to work.}}

}}

==Comparison==