Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1:
A '''modal operator''' is a [[logical connective]], in the language of a [[modal logic]], which forms propositions from propositions. In general, a modal operator is ''formally'' characterised by being non-[[truth function|truth-functional]], and ''intuitively'' characterised by expressing a modal attitude (such as necessity, possibility, belief, or knowledge) towards the proposition to which it is applied
In literary and fiction theory, the concept of '''modal operators''' has been explored by Lubomir [[Dolezel]] in Heterocosmica (1998), a book that articulates a complete theory of literary fiction based on the idea of [[possible worlds]]. Dolezel works with the concept of modalities that play the crucial role in ''formative operation'', i.e. in shaping narrative worlds into orders that have the potential to produce stories. Based on the theories of [[modal logic]], Dolezel introduces a set of modal systems that are appropriated for fictional [[semantics]], expanding on the table used by [[Georg Henrik von Wright]] (1968). There are four kinds of modal operators that function in the modal systems: [[alethic]], [[deontic]], [[axiological]] and [[epistemic]].
[[Alethic]] modal operators (M-operators) determine the fundamental conditions of [[fictional worlds]], especially [[causality]], time-space parameters, and the action capacity of persons. They indicate the possibility, impossibility and necessity of actions, states of affairs, events, people, and qualities in the [[fictional worlds]]. Alethic modal operators play an important role in distinguishing a natural [[fictional world]] from the supernatural and intermediate ones. “The natural world generates stories of human condition” and such stories tend to be tragic from the very beginning, for example [[J.W. Goethe]]’s ''[[The Sorrows of Young Werther]]''. The structure of the supernatural worlds is usually revealed by the alethic modal operators (a) when they show the presence of physically impossible beings in the [[fictional world]] (gods, spirits, monsters); (b) when selected natural-world persons are granted properties and action capacities that are not available to ordinary persons of that world: becoming invisible, flying on a carpet, etc.; (c) when inanimate objects are anthropomorphized (for example the legend of Don Juan in [[Alexander Pushkin]]’s ''The Stone Guest''.) The intermediate worlds are usually represented in dreams within a [[fictional world]].
[[Deontic]] modal operators (P-operators) influence the construction of [[fictional worlds]] as proscriptive or prescriptive norms, i.e. they indicate what is prohibited, obligatory, or permitted in the fictional world.
[[Axiological]] modal operators (G-operators) transform the world’s [[entities]] into values and disvalues as seen by a social group, a culture, or a historical period. Axiological modalities are highly subjective categories: what is good for one person may be considered as bad by another one. “Subjective abnegation of the world’s axiological order generates the story of the axiological alien” of which there are two kinds – the [[nihilist]] and the axiological rebel. A nihilist negates the axiological order of the world and replaces it with a subjective axiology with a single operator: indifference. An example of the nihilist axiological alien in literature is Pechorin, the protagonist of Mikhail [[Lermontov]]’s ''[[A Hero of Our Time]]'' (1839).
[[Epistemic]] modal operators (K-operators) reflect the level of knowledge, ignorance and belief in the [[fictional world]]. The epistemic imbalance in the fictional world of a story produces a “mystery
== Examples ==
|