Wikipedia talk:Student assignments/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 290:
:* '''Oppose''' -- This looks like [[WP:GRAVEDANCING]] on top of {{u|EJustice}} to me, considering you supported the indef. site-ban [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=777577890] and even opposed mediation by {{u|EdChem}} [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=777749295]. (I did participate too and supported Ed Chem's solution to work with the instructor rather than the more draconian solution ultimately chosen.) {{pb}} You claimed to have tried to work with the instructor [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=777407275], but I don't see it from [https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?users=Tryptofish&users=EJustice&users=&startdate=&enddate=&ns=&server=enwiki Interaction Analysis]. Compare with [https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?users=David+Tornheim&users=EJustice&users=&startdate=&enddate=&ns=&server=enwiki my interactions] or {{u|Seraphim System}}'s [https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?users=Seraphim+System&users=EJustice&users=&startdate=&enddate=&ns=&server=enwiki interactions]. {{pb}} I don't think it is appropriate for you to be adding this very unfortunate result to the page, given your involvement in bringing it about. We need consensus to add this negativity to the page. --[[User:David Tornheim|David Tornheim]] ([[User talk:David Tornheim|talk]]) 02:25, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
:*'''Oppose''' current wording, it's too informal and negative - while it is not customary to source additions to the "See also" section, by the same token it is not customary to use that section to introduce controversial language into the article. [[User:Seraphim System|<span style="font-family:Candara; color:#cc00cc; text-shadow:#b3b3cc 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''Seraphim System'''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Seraphim System|<span style="color:#009900;">talk
*The noticeboard discussion is archived at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive288#EJustice matter]]. It's a "see also" link, not in the main text here. I want to make some things ''very clear'' to other editors watching here. My personal opinions in that discussion are beside the point here, although my opinions happened to be the same as the consensus that emerged. And there ''was'' a community consensus. And my linking to the discussion is consistent with that consensus. David conspicuously dissented from the consensus there, but that does not change the fact that the community reached the consensus that was reached. In fact, there was very strong opposition to David's (and Seraphim System's) positions from the community. This information page is not the page to wikilawyer against that consensus. I'm also concerned that pinging Seraphim System, who was one of the other dissenters, without pinging everyone else in that discussion, borders on canvassing. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 16:23, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
| |||