Revision as of 14:10, 14 March 2007 edit Giano II (talk \| contribs) 22,233 edits →''Issue de table'' ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:08, 14 March 2007 edit undo Attilios (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 173,494 edits m Ciao Next edit →
Line 68: Thanks for the revert, I seem to have a new friend, I have explained on is page why I anotated the images in that fashion - hopefully that is an end to it. [[User:Giano II\|Giano]] 14:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC) :The way it is now, the article is frankly horrendous. No other well done articles in Wikipedia look like that mess. I can sustain that original way of referring in-text to images, but absolutely not the way they are placed (not to speak about the messy variation of sizes), and all those images of people: these are justified in a magazine article, not in an encyclopedical one. Bye. --[[User:Attilios\|Attilios]] 16:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Joopercoopers/Archive 1: Difference between revisions