Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
→Ordering of cardinals: Link to choice |
||
Line 102:
Assuming the [[law of excluded middle]] every [[subcountable]] set (a property in terms of surjections) is already countable, i.e. in the surjective image of <math>{\mathbb N}</math>, and every unbounded subset of <math>{\mathbb N}</math> is in bijection with <math>{\mathbb N}</math> itself. Likewise, by the classical [[Schröder–Bernstein theorem]], any two sets which are in the injective image of one another are in bijection as well.
With equality defined as the existence of a bijection between their underlying sets, Cantor also defines a [[preorder]] of cardinalities <math>|S|</math> and <math>|T|</math> in terms of the [[Cardinality#Comparing_sets|existence of injections]] between <math>S</math> and <math>T</math>. One can embed the naturals into the binary sequences, thus proving various ''injection existence'' statements explicitly, so that in this sense <math>|{\mathbb N}|\le|2^{\mathbb N}|</math>, where <math>2^{\mathbb N}</math> denotes the function space <math>{\mathbb N}\to\{0,1\}</math>. But following from the argument in the previous sections, there is ''no surjection'' and so also no bijection, and in this sense <math>|{\mathbb N}|<|2^{\mathbb N}|</math>. In the context of [[classical mathematics]], this exhausts the possibilities, giving a [[partial order|non-strict partial order]] or even a [[total order]]
Cantor's result then also implies that the notion of the [[set of all sets]] is inconsistent: If <math>S</math> were the set of all sets, then <math>{\mathcal P}S</math> would at the same time be bigger than <math>S</math> and a subset of <math>S</math>.
|