Human genetic clustering: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m author link Sarah S. Richardson
Line 81:
Some scholars{{who|date=August 2021}} have challenged the idea that race can be inferred by genetic clusters, drawing distinctions between arbitrarily assigned genetic clusters, ancestry, and race. One recurring caution against thinking of human populations in terms of clusters is the notion that genotypic variation and traits are distributed evenly between populations, along gradual [[Cline (biology)|clines]] rather than along discrete population boundaries; so although genetic similarities are usually organized geographically, their underlying populations have never been completely separated from one another. Due to migration, gene flow, and baseline homogeneity, features between groups are extensively overlapping and intermixed.<ref name=":32" /><ref name=":42" /> Moreover, genetic clusters do not typically match socially defined racial groups; many commonly understood races may not be sorted into the same genetic cluster, and many genetic clusters are made up of individuals who would have distinct racial identities.<ref name=":52" /> In general, clusters may most simply be understood as products of the methods used to sample and analyze genetic data; not without meaning for understanding ancestry and genetic characteristics, but inadequate to fully explaining the concept of race, which is more often described in terms of social and cultural forces.
 
In the related context of [[personalized medicine]], race is currently listed as a [[risk factor]] for a wide range of medical conditions with genetic and non-genetic causes. Questions have emerged regarding whether or not genetic clusters support the idea of race as a valid construct to apply to medical research and treatment of disease, because there are many diseases that correspond with specific genetic markers and/or with specific populations, as seen with [[Tay–Sachs disease|Tay-Sachs disease]] or [[sickle cell disease]].<ref name=":92" /><ref name=":63">{{Cite book|last1=Koenig|first1=Barbara A. Lee|first2=Sandra|last2=Soo-Jin|last3=Richardson|first3=Sarah S.|author-link3=Sarah S. Richardson|url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/468194495|title=Revisiting race in a genomic age|date=2008|publisher=Rutgers University Press|isbn=978-0-8135-4323-9|oclc=468194495}}</ref> Researchers are careful to emphasize that ancestry—revealed in part through cluster analyses—plays an important role in understanding risk of disease. But racial or ethnic identity does not perfectly align with genetic ancestry, and so race and ethnicity do not reveal enough information to make a medical diagnosis.<ref name=":63" /> Race as a variable in medicine is more likely to reflect social factors, where ancestry information is more likely to be meaningful when considering genetic ancestry.<ref name=":32" /><ref name=":63" />
 
== References ==