Talk:Cumulative density function: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:51, 16 June 2023

Revision as of 00:42, 17 June 2023

Line 69:

:Fair point about it not being a BLP. Am I challenging the veracity?

:I suppose, in a very mild sense, I am. I understand Michael's objection to "cumulative density function" and for those reasons would not use the phrase myself.

:But what do you get when you accumulate a density function.? To me, "a cumulative density function" seems like a not-totally-stupid answer. It's true that that function isn't itself a density function, but English — even mathematical English — is not necessarily so tidy as for that to be a fatal objection.

:Given that reasoning, I'm uncomfortable calling all the "otherwise respectable writers" wrong in Wikivoice. --[[User:Trovatore|Trovatore]] ([[User talk:Trovatore|talk]]) 22:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC)