Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries/Log/2007/February: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Replace or disable a template per TFD outcome; no change in content |
m Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (12x) Tag: Fixed lint errors |
||
Line 258:
The surreptitious split of Spanish stubs by region continues... unproposed, but looks well formed. Depending on the number of stubs it may need to be upmerged - I suppose that's a "wait and see". [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''[[User_talk:Grutness|<small style="color:#008822;">wha?</small>]]'' 01:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
:Ooops, I've too fast creating the stub for the Asturian related articles, I'm so sorry. Anyway, I've noticed there's no specific stub category covering various general stuff related to asturias (art, education, economy, images, etc...), so I think it coulbe a good idea to create a generic one: ''Cat:Asturias stubs'', a category that could even upmerge other stub-categories related to Asturias that are maybe too specific for a region with 1,076,896 pop --<
::Hmm... well, the only subtype of it there should be at the moment is the geo-stub one, and a lot of places have geo-stub categories but not general stub categories (also, see the note on bio-stubs on the proposal page!). It really does mainly depend on the numbers. if there are 60 or so stubs, there's no real problem with this - fewer than that, and keeping the template but directing it to the larger Spanish stub cat is probably the best way, at least until such time as there ''are'' 60 stubs. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''[[User_talk:Grutness|<small style="color:#008822;">wha?</small>]]'' 05:14, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
::: Yeah, well, I think you have point. If we look at the cold numbers, you're right. There's no real need to upmerge right now, as there aren't so many subtypes. But to have this general category and upmerge the geo-stub one could still be a good idea. --<
:::: I don't see any reason why {{tl|asturias-geo-stub}} would need to be upmerged, it has enough articles to have own category, and if we decide to keep the generic one, the geography category becomes child of it. [[User:Monni1995|Monni]] 05:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Line 426:
Unproposed, and I'd say very unlikely to reach 60 stubs. Upmerging could be the best option. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''[[User_talk:Grutness|<small style="color:#008822;">wha?</small>]]'' 00:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
* Currently only [[Psychoterror|one page]] transcludes the stub, and the [[:Category:Estonian musical groups|permcat]] has < 30 pages. I'd favor SFD and change the one page to {{tl|band-stub}} (Maybe {{tl|Euro-band-stub}} would be a good catchall for various small European countries?) <
** '''Support''' creating {{tl|euro-band-stub}} / {{cl|European musical group stubs}} and upmerging {{tl|Estonia-band-stub}} to that. [[User:Monni1995|Monni]] 17:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
*'''Update''': Now links to 16 items. [[User:Pegship|Her Pegship]] [[User talk:Pegship|<small style="color:green;"> (tis herself)</small>]] 21:25, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Line 436:
The result of the debate was '''send to [[WP:CFD]]'''<br /><br />
Unproposed, and splits bios by subnational region, something strongly discouraged here in the past. A likely sfds candidate, I'd say. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''[[User_talk:Grutness|<small style="color:#008822;">wha?</small>]]'' 02:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
* '''SFD''' - Zero transclusions from articles, I'm guessing this was made for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Idaho]]. <
:This is not a stub created specifically for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Idaho]]. I am unsure why it was created by the individual who did so. It is not a high priority catagory in my <small>tiny mind</small>. The basic '''Category for Idaho stubs''' is fine. --[[User:Robbiegiles|Robbie Giles]] 13:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
::Of note, {{cl|Idaho politician stubs}} has about 80 relevant members (which would not be retagged {{tl|Idaho-bio-stub}}) <
*'''Update''': Links to 2 items. [[User:Pegship|Her Pegship]] [[User talk:Pegship|<small style="color:green;"> (tis herself)</small>]] 21:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>
Line 447:
The result of the debate was '''list on [[WP:STUBS]]'''<br /><br />
Unproposed, but looks well constructed, and is a logical stub type to have. the one concern is size - if it doesn't get close to 60 stubs then upmerging may be the best solution, but perhaps it needs a "wait and see" for now... [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...''[[User_talk:Grutness|<small style="color:#008822;">wha?</small>]]'' 11:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
* '''Upmerge''' - The [[:Category:Belgian actors|permcat]] and its subcats only have 63 articles total, so the chance of this stub reaching 60 is remote. <
* '''Upmerge''' - not enough non-stub articles. [[User:Monni1995|Monni]] 18:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
*'''Update''': Now contains 38 items. Suggest we keep as the Films WikiProject is usually pretty diligent at keeping these up. [[User:Pegship|Her Pegship]] [[User talk:Pegship|<small style="color:green;"> (tis herself)</small>]] 21:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
| |||