Specified complexity: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Added {{Notability}}, {{Undue weight}}, {{Disputed}}, {{Hoax}}, {{POV}}, and {{Unreliable sources}} tags
SdkbBot (talk | contribs)
Line 53:
</blockquote>
 
Dembski notes that the term "Law of Conservation of Information" was previously used by [[Peter Medawar]] in his book <cite>The Limits of Science</cite> (1984) "to describe the weaker claim that deterministic laws cannot produce novel information."<ref>[http://www.designinference.com/documents/2005.03.Searching_Large_Spaces.pdf "Searching Large Spaces: Displacement and the No Free Lunch Regress (356k PDF)]", pp. 15-16, describing an argument made by [[Michael Shermer]] in ''How We Believe: Science, Skepticism, and the Search for God'', 2nd ed. (2003).</ref> The actual validity and utility of Dembski's proposed law are uncertain; it is neither widely used by the scientific community nor cited in mainstream scientific literature. A 2002 essay by Erik Tellgren provided a mathematical rebuttal of Dembski's law and concludes that it is "mathematically unsubstantiated." <ref>[http://www.talkreason.org/articles/dembski_LCI.pdf On Dembski's law of conservation of information] Erik Tellgren. talkreason.org, 2002. (PDF file)</ref>
 
==Specificity==