Content deleted Content added
Fixed grammar |
Extract out section on EJB |
||
Line 123:
The {{code|@Resource}} annotation conforms to [[JSR 250]] or Common Annotations for the Java Platform, and allows for autowiring references to POJOs by name.{{sfn | Deinum | Rubio | Long | Mak | 2014 | loc=§3-4 Auto-wire POJOs the @Resource and @Inject annotation | pp=151-154}} The {{code|@Inject}} annotation conforms to JSR 300 or Standard Annotations for injection allows for autowiring references to POJOs by type.{{sfn | Deinum | Rubio | Long | Mak | 2014 | loc=§3-4 Auto-wire POJOs the @Resource and @Inject annotation | pp=151-154}}
===Relationship with Jakarta Enterprise Beans (EJB)===▼
{{main article | Jakarta Enterprise Beans}}▼
The container can be turned into a partially compliant [[Enterprise JavaBeans#EJB 3.0, final release (2006-05-11)|EJB (Enterprise JavaBeans) 3.0]] container by means of the Pitchfork project.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} Some{{Who|date=May 2011}} criticize the Spring Framework for not complying with standards.<ref>[http://www.andygibson.net/blog/index.php/2008/08/28/is-spring-between-the-devil-and-the-ejb Spring VS EJB3]</ref>{{Failed verification|reason=Error 404 Page not found|date=June 2023}} However, SpringSource doesn't see EJB 3 compliance as a major goal, and claims that the Spring Framework and the container allow for more powerful programming models.<ref>▼
{{cite web▼
| url = http://www.springsource.com/web/guest/pitchfork/pitchfork-faq▼
| title = Pitchfork FAQ▼
| access-date = 2006-06-06}}▼
</ref>{{Failed verification|date=June 2023}}▼
===Aspect-oriented programming framework===
Line 362 ⟶ 353:
Spring WebFlux supports [[server-sent events]] (SSE), which is a server push technology that allows the client to get automatic updates from a server through an HTTP connection. This communication is unidirectional, and shares many similarities with the publish/subscribe model found in JMS.{{sfn|Deinum|Cosmina|2021|loc=§11 The WebSocket Protocol|pp=422-425}}
▲{{main article | Jakarta Enterprise Beans}}
▲The container can be turned into a partially compliant [[Enterprise JavaBeans#EJB 3.0, final release (2006-05-11)|EJB (Enterprise JavaBeans) 3.0]] container by means of the Pitchfork project.{{Citation needed|date=June 2023}} Some{{Who|date=May 2011}} criticize the Spring Framework for not complying with standards.<ref>[http://www.andygibson.net/blog/index.php/2008/08/28/is-spring-between-the-devil-and-the-ejb Spring VS EJB3]</ref>{{Failed verification|reason=Error 404 Page not found|date=June 2023}} However, SpringSource doesn't see EJB 3 compliance as a major goal, and claims that the Spring Framework and the container allow for more powerful programming models.<ref>
▲{{cite web
▲ | url = http://www.springsource.com/web/guest/pitchfork/pitchfork-faq
▲ | title = Pitchfork FAQ
▲ | access-date = 2006-06-06}}
▲</ref>{{Failed verification|date=June 2023}}
==Spring4Shell vulnerability==
| |||