Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archimedes Plutonium (2nd): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Greglocock (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 13:
*'''Comment''' This AfD appears to have been solicited by the subject of the article ({{user|Superdeterminism}}). [[User:FiggyBee|FiggyBee]] 20:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
:*He got me to look at it, after I apparently RV'd one of his edits doing RC patrol this afternoon... when I googled him, however, and tried to look him up, it appeared he was non-notable, so I nominated for deletion. - [[User_talk:DennyColt|Denny]] 20:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
* Keep. AP gets 21000 google hits. I don't know if that counts as notability but it sure indicates existence and interest. The fact that the subject has requested removal of the page was irrelevant in other AfDs. In my opinion one of CSTAR's later edits is a good fair description of the subject. Usenet is hard to document in dead trees for obvious reasons. [[User:Greglocock|Greglocock]] 20:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
:* There are RS sources about other internet 'legends', but the problem is this person simply fails our standards for notability. Can you address my points above? thank you. - [[User_talk:DennyColt|Denny]] 20:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
| |||