Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alcazar Library arson attack: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 38:
::What in the world are you talking about? Breitbart is considered an unreliable source and its usage is not permitted on Wikipedia. If you think we are all "blinded by leftist bias" (whatever that even means) then I don't think you'll have a very good time with this site's policy on sources. --[[User:Dynamo128|Dynamo128]] ([[User talk:Dynamo128|talk]]) 20:32, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Per nom. and pretty much everyone above, the page as it is is clearly not fit for purppse. The keep !vote and another suggest a move and repurpose, but this is back door deletion, in any case. If we change the article and pretty much all the content, it is a delete by another name. There is a definite case for an article, based on the French article, per Necrothesp, but reading that article shows the little history that has been written here is wrong and needs a healthy dose of TNT. The building was a theatre until 1966. It was not repurposed as a library until 2004. So creating an article is fine, but this article needs deletion. [[User:Sirfurboy|Sirfurboy🏄]] ([[User talk:Sirfurboy|talk]]) 20:36, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
:https://twitter.com/ArthurM40330824/status/1676359478822699008?s=20
:This is trending on twitter.. [[Special:Contributions/173.163.190.30|173.163.190.30]] ([[User talk:173.163.190.30|talk]]) 00:58, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
| |||