Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alcazar Library arson attack: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
Line 40:
*'''Delete''' - Per nom. and pretty much everyone above, the page as it is is clearly not fit for purppse. The keep !vote and another suggest a move and repurpose, but this is back door deletion, in any case. If we change the article and pretty much all the content, it is a delete by another name. There is a definite case for an article, based on the French article, per Necrothesp, but reading that article shows the little history that has been written here is wrong and needs a healthy dose of TNT. The building was a theatre until 1966. It was not repurposed as a library until 2004. So creating an article is fine, but this article needs deletion. [[User:Sirfurboy|Sirfurboy🏄]] ([[User talk:Sirfurboy|talk]]) 20:36, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 
:*[https://twitter.com/ArthurM40330824/status/1676359478822699008?s=20 link] This is trending on twitter.. [[Special:Contributions/173.163.190.30|173.163.190.30]] ([[User talk:173.163.190.30|talk]]) 00:58, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
:This is trending on twitter.. [[Special:Contributions/173.163.190.30|173.163.190.30]] ([[User talk:173.163.190.30|talk]]) 00:58, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
::Deleted tweets, or as we call 'em in the industry, the Paragons of Truth <span style="border:1px solid;padding:2px 6px;font-variant:small-caps">'''〜 [[User:Festucalex|<span style="color:#3cb400">Festucalex</span>]] • [[User talk:Festucalex|<span style="color:#ff007f">talk</span>]]'''</span> 04:49, 5 July 2023 (UTC)