Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alcazar Library arson attack: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 49:
:::Appeal to emotion using language that virtually no person in the world would in regards to an event like this even if it were real ("attack on indigenous culture"? really?). Which, of course, doesn't even matter since if you think none of the parts of this article appear to be incorrect, I have to question if you even read the article or bothered to check any of the sources... --[[User:Dynamo128|Dynamo128]] ([[User talk:Dynamo128|talk]]) 08:25, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Gene93k|Dynamo128}} I gather this AfD has gained attention on far-right Twitter, and thus we got a bunch of IPs (and this one [[WP:SPU]]) coming here to troll. Remember, [[WP:DONTFEED]]. <span style="border:1px solid;padding:2px 6px;font-variant:small-caps">'''〜 [[User:Festucalex|<span style="color:#3cb400">Festucalex</span>]] • [[User talk:Festucalex|<span style="color:#ff007f">talk</span>]]'''</span> 11:14, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
:::::Thank you, duly noted. --[[User:Dynamo128|Dynamo128]] ([[User talk:Dynamo128|talk]]) 12:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
::https://twitter.com/elonteslaholic/status/1674799695254925316?s=20
::It's so easy to search on any social media. Not sure why Breitbart is blacklisted. It's owned by CCP. Aren't we CCP owned now? So should be any MSM corporate owned media until the Smith Mundt Act which allowed propaganda in 2012 in the US is rescinded or replaced.
| |||