Revision as of 17:46, 9 July 2023 edit Chamaemelum (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,119 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:40, 9 July 2023 edit undo Forbes72 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 20,676 edits keep Next edit →
Line 10: '''[[WP:SNOW\|Snowball]] keep''': Recently applied tags notwithstanding, article seems well sourced. The topic has attracted enough scholarly commentary to demonstrate notability. [[User:Just plain Bill\|Just plain Bill]] ([[User talk:Just plain Bill\|talk]]) 13:00, 9 July 2023 (UTC) '''Keep''': Just because an idea is pseudoscience doesn't mean cover of the topic is not encyclopedic. There's an extensive encyclopedic coverage of things like [[Hermetica]]. The article might be a hoax if it was written credulously, but the text is actually pretty upfront about the non-scientific nature of the topic ([[WP:NHOAX]]). 〈 [[User:Forbes72\|Forbes<sub>72</sub>]] \| [[User_talk:Forbes72\|Talk]] 〉 22:40, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Specified complexity: Difference between revisions