Revision as of 04:16, 10 July 2023 edit Partofthemachine (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 19,559 edits Keep ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:11, 10 July 2023 edit undo Athel cb (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions 22,033 edits →Specified complexity Next edit →
Line 12: '''Keep''': Just because an idea is pseudoscience doesn't mean coverage of the topic is not encyclopedic. There's an extensive encyclopedic coverage of things like [[Hermetica]]. The article might be a hoax if it was written credulously, but the text is actually pretty upfront about the non-scientific nature of the topic ([[WP:NHOAX]]). 〈 [[User:Forbes72\|Forbes<sub>72</sub>]] \| [[User_talk:Forbes72\|Talk]] 〉 22:40, 9 July 2023 (UTC) '''Keep''' The subject matter being pseudoscientific is not a reason to delete the article. It just means we need to be careful to follow [[WP:FRINGE]]. [[User:Partofthemachine\|Partofthemachine]] ([[User talk:Partofthemachine\|talk]]) 04:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC) * '''Keep.''' I'm not keen on the concept or the people associated with it, but that's beside the point: it has been widely discussed and needs to have an article. [[User:Athel cb\|Athel cb]] ([[User talk:Athel cb\|talk]]) 08:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Specified complexity: Difference between revisions