Talk:No-code development platform: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Tags: Reverted Reply
Restored revision 1140899230 by Curb Safe Charmer (talk): Not a place to add links to your blog post
Line 7:
 
See [[Talk:Low-code development platform]]. Request to merge was open for one year, far exceeding the 30 day limit. [[User:Group29|Group29]] ([[User talk:Group29|talk]]) 16:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 
:Two completely different platform, serving different end user markets. For anyone with such thoughts, please educate yourself about the [https://five.co/low-code-vs-no-code-vs-pro-code/ differences between low code and no code] 1st. [[Special:Contributions/202.190.62.111|202.190.62.111]] ([[User talk:202.190.62.111|talk]]) 09:14, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 
== Corporate buzzword ==
 
I don't doubt that people use the terms "low code" or "no code", but the way this article describes it, it sounds like a well-established phenomenon rather than minor slang. It's corporate buzzword speak, and I'm not at all surprised to see Forrester mentioned here. Maybe they even wrote this article to make up this "sector". I say this should be deleted or merged to some other place. [[Special:Contributions/141.226.14.192|141.226.14.192]] ([[User talk:141.226.14.192|talk]]) 07:42, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 
:3 years had past, luckily this wiki was preserved. At the rate the software world is growing there are more laymen (citizen developers) users who can't differentiate between the 2 and use it interchangeably. And to make matters worse they are removing proper researched articles that is useful for people who are still confused between the two terms. I wrote a piece on [https://five.co/no-code-development/ why real developers are staying away from no code] which would give these users better context if no code is really suitable for them or not. [[Special:Contributions/202.190.62.111|202.190.62.111]] ([[User talk:202.190.62.111|talk]]) 09:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)