Revision as of 09:10, 13 July 2023 edit Gah4 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 9,921 edits →Even something as simple as writing a "sequential file" is coded differently e.g. in z/OS than in z/VSE.: way too different! ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:23, 13 July 2023 edit undo Chatul (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 8,442 edits →Even something as simple as writing a "sequential file" is coded differently e.g. in z/OS than in z/VSE.: true for any language processor with user libraries Next edit →
Line 218: ::: :::Looks fine to me. I do still wonder, though, if they should be separate articles. We wouldn't have the same article for Unix assembler and Windows assembler, even when running on the same hardware. As I never had the chance to run anything on DOS/360, it took some time to know how different they are! [[User:Gah4\|Gah4]] ([[User talk:Gah4\|talk]]) 09:09, 13 July 2023 (UTC) ::::The references to [[z/OS]] and [[z/VSE]] are just examples of the fact that HLASM allows user-provided libraries and does not dictate the contents of those libraries. -- [[User:Chatul\|Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul]] ([[User talk:Chatul\|talk]]) 11:23, 13 July 2023 (UTC) :Essentially the same is true for anything that allows user-defined libraries: the semantics, and sometimes the syntax, depend on the libraries that the user provides. There is nothing special about, e.g., ''SYS1.MACLIB'', from the perspective of HLASM. -- [[User:Chatul\|Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul]] ([[User talk:Chatul\|talk]]) 11:23, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Talk:IBM Basic assembly language and successors: Difference between revisions