Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mojo (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:36, 15 July 2023

Revision as of 04:46, 16 July 2023

Line 27:

*:I did see the New Stack article but I think it's a contributed article (as described in [https://thenewstack.io/contributions/]), as the author is not listed on [https://thenewstack.io/about-and-contact-info/ the staff], (although, she has many more posts than 1 per 3 months, so maybe she does have a close relationship with TNS?). But, regardless, from the colloquial language like "Advertising, amirite?" I don't think it went through much of an editorial review, let alone fact-checking like a reputable news source. I think it just counts as a blog post hence unreliable.

*:So that leaves us at 2 reliable sources. I like the merging idea, certainly in this discussion Zramsey11's primary argument for notability was that the team is led by Chris Lattner and he has a good track record of releasing languages, so discussing Mojo in the context of Chris Lattner seems warranted. [[User:Mathnerd314159|Mathnerd314159]] ([[User talk:Mathnerd314159|talk]]) 16:35, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

*'''Weak Merge''' to [[Chris Lattner#Modular and Mojo]]. I agree with other participants that [[Infoworld]] is IMO SIGCOV by GNG standards (though I'm neutral on whether it meets the mark using the stricter corporate product standards) and is a RS. However, I'm not especially convinced by the other sources. ''NewStack'' has an about us page but no clear editorial policies and the author does not appear to be a subject-matter-expert ({{tq|developer marketing writer}} is very questionable), so I don't think it's a reliable source. Likewise, ''Analytics India'' lacks a clear editorial process and the branded content program and other info in the abouts/advertising section doesn't give me much confidence. I would be more inclined to think it's reliable had there been clear subject-matter-expertise among its stuff or widespread USEBYOTHERS that I'm not seeing here, though I am not 100% sure whether this is unreliable or not as I'm not especially familiar with Indian technology-related sources. Otherwise, my search on Google mainly found blogs and developer sites that doesn't seem to meet the requirements of GNG or [[WP:NPRODUCT|NPRODUCT]], so to me (albeit weakly) this doesn't meet GNG. However, there's some sourced info from RS (Infoworld) that would warrant a merge/redirect to [[Chris Lattner#Modular and Mojo]] as an ATD. '''[[User:VickKiang|<span style="color:blue; padlue 2px 2px 2px;">VickKiang</span>]]''' [[User talk:VickKiang|<span style="color:light blue; padlue 2px 2px 2px;">(talk)</span>]] 04:46, 16 July 2023 (UTC)