Revision as of 08:32, 30 April 2023 edit ClueBot NG (talk \| contribs) Bots, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 6,479,511 edits m Reverting possible vandalism by 182.3.169.2 to version by 0xDeadbeef. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (4237019) (Bot) Tag: Rollback ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:08, 19 July 2023 edit undo ULPS (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Temporary account IP viewers 13,844 edits wording Tag: 2017 wikitext editor Next edit →
Line 37: ==Behavior== According to a benchmark by [[Mozilla]], PDF.js is performant for viewing most common PDF files, while it may have some issues with large or 'graphics-heavy' documents.<ref>{{Cite web\|url=https://hacks.mozilla.org/2014/05/how-fast-is-pdf-js/\|title=How fast is PDF.js? – Mozilla Hacks - the Web developer blog}}</ref> PDF.js supports most of the PDF specifications (including form support or [[XFA]]<ref>{{Cite web\|title=1706133 - (pdf-xfa) [meta] XFA support\|url=https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1706133\|access-date=2022-01-28\|website=bugzilla.mozilla.org\|language=en}}</ref>), but some features have not been implemented yet, which may impact rendering behavior depending on the features the document uses.<ref>{{Cite web\|title=Guide to Evaluating PDF.js Rendering\|url=https://pdftron.com/blog/pdf-js/guide-to-pdf-js-rendering/\|access-date=2021-08-05\|website=PDFTron}}</ref>

PDF.js: Difference between revisions