Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mojo (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Scope creep (talk | contribs) ce, keep |
Relisting discussion (XFDcloser) |
||
Line 3:
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=Mojo (programming language)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mojo (programming language)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Mojo (programming language)}})
Programming language, with no serious claims to notability. Was sent to draft by NPP, banged back into mainspace with the claim of multiple RS. I don't see them here and WP:BEFORE shows no record of enduring influence or prominence/notability as a language tool. And the article's promotional, to boot. [[User:Alexandermcnabb|Alexandermcnabb]] ([[User talk:Alexandermcnabb|talk]]) 13:55, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Line 29:
*'''Weak Merge''' to [[Chris Lattner#Modular and Mojo]]. I agree with other participants that [[Infoworld]] is IMO SIGCOV by GNG standards (though I'm neutral on whether it meets the mark using the stricter corporate product standards) and is a RS. However, I'm not especially convinced by the other sources. ''NewStack'' has an about us page but no clear editorial policies and the author does not appear to be a subject-matter-expert ({{tq|developer marketing writer}} is very questionable), so I don't think it's a reliable source. Likewise, ''Analytics India'' lacks a clear editorial process and the branded content program and other info in the abouts/advertising section doesn't give me much confidence. I would be more inclined to think it's reliable had there been clear subject-matter-expertise among its stuff or widespread USEBYOTHERS that I'm not seeing here, though I am not 100% sure whether this is unreliable or not as I'm not especially familiar with Indian technology-related sources. Otherwise, my search on Google mainly found blogs and developer sites that doesn't seem to meet the requirements of GNG or [[WP:NPRODUCT|NPRODUCT]], so to me (albeit weakly) this doesn't meet GNG. However, there's some sourced info from RS (Infoworld) that would warrant a merge/redirect to [[Chris Lattner#Modular and Mojo]] as an ATD. '''[[User:VickKiang|<span style="color:blue; padlue 2px 2px 2px;">VickKiang</span>]]''' [[User talk:VickKiang|<span style="color:light blue; padlue 2px 2px 2px;">(talk)</span>]] 04:46, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' I heard about it recently. As a software developement project it has a space on Wikipedia, per long consensus. Coverage on three continents. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus">[[User:scope_creep|<span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:scope_creep#top|Talk]]</sup></span>''' 10:41, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family: MV Boli;">[[User:Dusti|<b style="color:#F00">D</b><b style="color:#F60">u</b><b style="color:#090">s</b><b style="color:#00F">t</b><b style="color:#60C">i</b>]][[User talk:Dusti|<sup>*Let's talk!*</sup>]]</span> 20:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Mojo (programming language)]]</noinclude></p>
| |||