Talk:Excess post-exercise oxygen consumption: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:22, 30 March 2005

Revision as of 03:29, 30 March 2005

Line 60:

[[User:Blair P. Houghton|Blair P. Houghton]] 01:06, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

:*Then you know nothing about those studies. Do you think they just pulled the numbers out of thin air? Those studies measured the effect in a controlled environment and found the stated results, from very specific, measured exercise programs. Results from studies are what needs to be reported not your POV that the study does not support. You don't just get to discount multiple studies that disagree with your POV and cling to one that doesn't even support your claim. If you have some data from some quality studies that supports your claim, please bring that to our attention; the current ones certainly do not support it. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] 02:22, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

==What the evidence supports==

The changes I made reflect the following facts:

# Anaerobic exercise is higher in intensity than aerobic exercise, that's why it reaches the anaerobic regime.

# The combination of intensity and recovery intervals over a period of anaerobic exercise may produce a lower calorie output than aerobic exercise during exercise; but,

# it will produce a higher calorie consumption over the 24 hours beginning with the exercise.

# You can't prove that something hasn't been shown.

# "Whether this result was caused by the EPOC effect has not been established" is impossible to prove; it's nothing but a POV opinion. The sense that more than EPOC may be going on is covered in "caloric expenditure that occurs during the EPOC phase after anaerobic exercise."

It's redundant with the statement that was there before the paragraph was added, but some people don't seem to have a sense of when less is more, which goes with their lack of a sense of when facts are supportable. [[User:Blair P. Houghton|Blair P. Houghton]] 03:29, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)