Revision as of 08:25, 4 August 2023 edit SD0001 (talk \| contribs) Election clerks, Interface administrators, Administrators 16,552 edits →User:Nardog/RefRenamer.js not listed in WP:TOPSCRIPTS: reply to Headbomb Tag: CD ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:11, 4 August 2023 edit undo Nardog (talk \| contribs) Edit filter helpers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors, Temporary account IP viewers 85,709 edits →User:Nardog/RefRenamer.js not listed in WP:TOPSCRIPTS: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 30: ::Are you sure it's not an issue with how the bot makes the search? Because https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=contentmodel%3Ajavascript+RefRenamer.js&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns2=1&ns118=1 seems to find it just fine. So does https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=insource%3A%2FRefRenamer%5C.js%2F&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns2=1&ns118=1 or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Nardog/RefRenamer.js <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb\|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb\|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb\|c]] · [[WP:PHYS\|p]] · [[WP:WBOOKS\|b]]}</span> 07:34, 4 August 2023 (UTC) :::Yes, the bot needs to make the search with srsort=incoming_links_desc to get the 5000 candidates for top scripts, to avoid having to analyse all the 88343 pages. The page doesn't show up with that parameter set, even though pages with significantly less links (like some users' monobook.js pages) do. – [[User:SD0001\|<span style="font-weight: bold; color: #C30">SD0001</span>]] ([[User talk:SD0001\|talk]]) 08:25, 4 August 2023 (UTC) ::::How about, as a tentative measure, including all local .js pages linked from WP:USL? [[User:Nardog\|Nardog]] ([[User talk:Nardog\|talk]]) 19:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:User scripts/Most imported scripts: Difference between revisions