Content deleted Content added
Tapeworms27 (talk | contribs) →Archive and other stuff: Reply |
→Archive and other stuff: Reply |
||
Line 35:
:Also should we update the Wikiproject template quality levels? I'd like to think that the article has been improved a lot. I'm not familiar with assessing that, so that's a thing that could be done if anybody wants to. [[User:Tapeworms27|Tapeworms27]] ([[User talk:Tapeworms27|talk]]) 23:43, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
::@[[User:Tapeworms27|Tapeworms27]] thanks! I mostly agree with your changes, and archiving most of the old discussions here which were either stale or outdated with the current version of the wiki anyway.
::I'm not very familiar with quality assessment levels, but having had a quick look at [[Wikipedia:Content assessment]], I'm not so sure I'd rate the current version of this page as more than C. I think there's still plenty that can be done, both in quality of writing for some of the sections, and in additional content to add. For example, adding how the algorithm works out in an explicit toy example would help a lot digesting the material. Also some additional detail about the number of qubits required in the first register is needed: currently the article just says "2n is sufficient" without saying why. [[User:Luca Innocenti|Luca]] ([[User talk:Luca Innocenti|talk]]) 20:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
| |||