Crackpot index: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Removing {{more citations needed}}, things are generally verifiable now, adding one {{cn}}. Removing {{notability}}, we have multiple independent sources with SIGCOV
improve lead based on information verifiable in later text
Line 1:
The '''crackpotThe indexCrackpot Index''' is a number that rates scientific claims or the individuals that make them, in conjunction with a method for computing that number. It was proposed by [[John C. Baez]] in 1992, and updated in 1998.

While the indices haveindex beenwas created for theirits humorous value, theirthe general concepts can be applied in other fields like risk management.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eXPCBwAAQBAJ&q=%22crackpot+index%22&pg=PA137|title=The Failure of Risk Management: Why It's Broken and How to Fix It|last=Hubbard|first=Douglas W.|date=2009-04-27|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=9780470387955|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.wired.com/2006/01/every_field_of_/|title=Every field of study deserves its own Crackpot Index|author=Wired Staff|magazine=WIRED|access-date=2018-07-17|language=en-US|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180717124851/https://www.wired.com/2006/01/every_field_of_/|archive-date=July 17, 2018}}</ref>
 
== Baez's crackpot index ==
The method, initially proposed semi-seriously by mathematical physicist [[John C. Baez]] in 1992. In 1998, the computation of the index used responses to a list of 37 questions, each positive response contributing a point value ranging from 1 to 50; the computation is initialized with a value of &minus;5.<ref name=NSUniversal>{{cite magazine
| date = 28 April 2010
| title = Towards a universal crackpot standard