Modal testing: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Impact Hammer Modal Testing: Fixed typographical errors and improved grammar.
m Shaker Modal Testing: Grammatical and spelling changes.
Line 17:
Small objects or structures can be attached directly to the [[Simulation table|shaker table]]. With some types of shakers, an armature is often attached to the body to be tested by way of piano wire (pulling force) or stinger (Pushing force). When the signal is transmitted through the piano wire or the stinger, the object responds the same way as impact testing, by attenuating some and amplifying certain frequencies. These frequencies are measured as modal frequencies. Usually a load cell is placed between the shaker and the structure to obtain the excitation force.
 
For large civil engineering structures much larger shakers are used, which can weighhave a mass of 100 [[kg]] and above, and are able to apply a force of many hundreds of [[newtons]]. Several types of shakers are common: rotating mass shakers, electro-dynamicelectrodynamic shakers, and electrohydraulic shakers. For rotating mass shakers, the force can be calculated by knowing the mass and the speed of rotation;, while for theelectrodynamic electro-dynamic shakershakers, the force can be obtained through a load cell or an accelerometer placed on the moving mass of the shaker. Shakers can have an advantage over the impact hammer as they can supply more energy to a structure over a longer period of time. However, problems can also be introduced; shakers can influence the dynamic properties of the structure and can also increase the complexity of analysis due to [[window function|windowing]] errors.
 
==See also==