Content deleted Content added
→History: Tag correct text as {{not a typo}} for automated spell checkers (including Wikipedia:Typo Team/moss) |
No edit summary Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 5:
Classifiers share some limited similarities with the [[Gesture|gestures]] of hearing non-signers. Those who do not know the sign language can often guess the meaning of these constructions. This is because they are often [[Sign language#Iconicity|iconic]] (non-arbitrary).{{Sfn|Brentari|2010|p=254}} It has also been found that many unrelated sign languages use similar handshapes for specific entities. Children master these constructions around the age of 8 or 9.{{Sfn|Emmorey|2008|p=194-195}} Two-handed classifier constructions have a [[Figure–ground (perception)|figure-ground]] relationship. Specifically, the first classifier represents the background whereas the second one represents the entity in focus. The right [[Cerebral hemisphere|hemisphere of the brain]] is involved in using classifiers. They may also be used creatively for story-telling and poetic purposes.
[[Nancy Frishberg|Frishberg]] coined the word "classifier" in this context in her 1975 paper on [[American Sign Language]]. Various connections have been made to [[Classifier (linguistics)|classifiers]]
gin spoken languages. Linguists have since then debated on how best to analyze these constructions. Analyses differ in how much they rely on morphology to explain them. Some have questioned their linguistic status, as well as the very use of the term "classifier".{{Sfn|Brentari|2010|p=253-254}} Not much is known yet about their [[syntax]] or [[phonology]]. == Description ==
| |||