Talk:Excess post-exercise oxygen consumption: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:57, 30 March 2005

Revision as of 00:09, 31 March 2005

Line 98:

::Repeating again, because Blair is ignoring it many times, is that the webpage exrx.net that he is drawing his conclusion from does not make the conclusion he is claiming. It does not claim the fat loss was due to the EPOC effect, and the study its information is from was not properly controlled to make that conclusion. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] 15:51, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

::And just to make this clear, I am not 129.223.115.87. Any developer could check that. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] 00:09, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

What I learnt in medical school was that anaerobic metabolism is inefficient, and would lead to a higher energy consumption. The [[lactate]] formed would need [[gluconeogenesis]] in the liver, with additional energy expenditure (and, supposedly, catch-up oxygen consumption).