Content deleted Content added
→Outdated version information: new section |
|||
Line 42:
See http://grokbase.com/t/gg/scala-user/131pet3xr5/whats-the-state-of-scala-net. I think that it should be edited, since as it is written now, it seems that .NET is fully supported, which is not quite the state. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:ספלינטור|ספלינטור]] ([[User talk:ספלינטור|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ספלינטור|contribs]]) 21:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
----
Scala can call Java classes or use its jars, but the opposite isn't true: Java can't interact with Scala methods or classes (at least, not easily). This makes Scala not interoperable with Java. This isn't mentioned enough.
Maybe Scala had for goal to address issues of Java, but currently it's learning curve put it among the programming langages the most difficult to learn.
Consider it's TIOBE ranking falling to 0.5%, or books about Machine Learning available now, that are only offering o explain Apache Spark programmation with the help of Python and not Scala anymore.
Yes, same as some wrote here, I believe that this page is too much promotional. And that reality is not so nice.
[[Special:Contributions/192.93.161.33|192.93.161.33]] ([[User talk:192.93.161.33|talk]]) 13:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
== Quick sort example ==
| |||