|
::: Because the discussion seems to be dormant, I will be removing this template (see point 7 of [[WP:WTRMT]]). If someone does not agree with this, please feel free to put it there again and write on the talk page.
::: Happy editing [[User:TheFibonacciEffect|TheFibonacciEffect]] ([[User talk:TheFibonacciEffect|talk]]) 23:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
== Is it time for some separate Julia packages to get their own page? ==
I have Flux.jl and/or Knet.jl in mind, and JuMP was first state-of-the-art Julia package, there's also e.g. SciML/[[DifferentialEquations.jl]] (and other in that ecosystem) and a ton more. Maybe Gen.jl or similar, I just do not follow such packages too much.
[[Project Jupyter]] has a page (in part because of Julia, why the prefix Ju-, it was formerly [[IPython]]), Pluto.jl seems to improve on it (is Julia-only, I'm pretty sure). [[User:Comp.arch|comp.arch]] ([[User talk:Comp.arch|talk]]) 13:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
: I know you know it, but just so others know the precedent: Flux has one already :) [[Flux (machine-learning framework)]]. Other notable Julia packages will get their too in the due time. I am enthusiastically in favor of DifferentialEquations.jl, but Gen.jl and Turing.jl are quite notable too. They were even referenced in other articles IIRC [[User:Bruno H Vieira|Bruno H Vieira]] ([[User talk:Bruno H Vieira|talk]]) 00:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
== Strong Typing ==
I removed the claim that Julia is a "strongly typed language," as the citation given was poor and ambiguous. The citation linked to a forum thread, wherein a user claimed that Julia is "strongly typed," citing Wikipedia to do so, and then another user below them claims the opposite, also citing Wikipedia. A forum thread is already not a reliable source of information, but add to that that the cited thread leaves the question of whether or not Julia is strongly typed as inconclusive at best, and it seemed appropriate to not only remove the citation, but the potentially erroneous claim as well.
If this edit has been made in error, feel free to revert and add in a less ambiguous source. [[User:Drgribb|drgribb]] ([[User talk:Drgribb|talk]]) 20:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
:Hi! Pondering on the correctness of typesystem statements here, it might be also useful to clarify the claim on parametric types in the table below: "Parametric types" header links to parametric polymorphism page which actually provides a definition of parametric polymorphism that conflicts with the definition of Julia, which instead more or less precisely satisfies the "ad-hoc polymorphism" definition. I believe the correct name for what describes the table column there is "indexed types" as in here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generic_programming . [[User:Exaexa|Exaexa]] ([[User talk:Exaexa|talk]]) 07:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
== Moving "Notable uses" subsection to a new "Adoption" section? ==
| 