Content deleted Content added
Matthiaspaul (talk | contribs) →Further reading: improved ref |
Matthiaspaul (talk | contribs) →Further reading: improved refs |
||
Line 280:
== Further reading ==
* {{cite journal |title=Human behaviour and performance in calculator use with Algebraic and Reverse Polish Notation |author-first1=Dennis Michael |author-last1=Kasprzyk |author-first2=Colin G. |author-last2=Drury |author-first3=Wayne F. |author-last3=Bialas |___location=Department of Industrial Engineering, [[State University of New York at Buffalo]], Amherst, New York, USA |journal=[[Ergonomics (journal)|Ergonomics]] |issn=0014-0139 |eissn=1366-5847 |publisher=[[Taylor & Francis]] |volume=22 |issue=9 |date=1979 |orig-date=1978-09-25 |doi=10.1080/00140137908924675 |s2cid=62692402 |pages=1011–1019}} (9 pages)
* {{cite web |title=Advanced Calculator Logic HP RPN/Algebraic: A Comparative Analysis. |publisher=[[Hewlett-Packard Corporation]] |date=1979 |___location=Corvallis, Oregon, USA |id=5953-1930 |url=http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/access/text/2016/05/102651973-05-01-acc.pdf |access-date=2022-12-26 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221226175054/http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/access/text/2016/05/102651973-05-01-acc.pdf |archive-date=2022-12-26}} (13 pages)
* {{cite journal |title=Electronic calculators: which notation is the better? |journal=[[Applied Ergonomics]] |issn=0003-6870 |eissn=1872-9126 |volume=11 |issue=1 |date=March 1980 |pages=2–6 |author-first1=Seb J. |author-last1=Agate |author-first2=Colin G. |author-last2=Drury |___location=Department of Industrial Engineering, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, USA |doi=10.1016/0003-6870(80)90114-3 |pmid=15676368 |id=0003-6870/80/01 0002-05 |publisher=[[IPC Business Press]] |url=https://www.keesvandersanden.nl/calculators/downloads/Electronic-calculators-which-notation-is-the-better.pdf |access-date=2018-09-22 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230923063402/https://www.keesvandersanden.nl/calculators/downloads/Electronic-calculators-which-notation-is-the-better.pdf |archive-date=2023-09-23}} (5 pages)
* {{cite book |title=Calculators: A Categorized Compilation of References. Supplement 1. |author-last=Suydam |author-first=Marilyn N. |publisher=Calculator Information Center, [[Ohio State University]] |publication-place=Columbus, Ohio, USA |date=December 1980 |id=ED199087. SE034434 |url=https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED199087.pdf |access-date=2022-10-16 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210919201034/https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED199087.pdf |archive-date=2021-09-19}} (64 pages)
* {{cite conference |title=Interruption as a test of the user-computer interface |author-first1=John G. |author-last1=Kreifeldt |author-first2=Mary E. |author-last2=McCarthy |___location=Department of Engineering Design, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA |conference=Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference on Manual Control |publication-place=University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA |publisher=[[Jet Propulsion Laboratory]] / [[Office of Naval Research]] / [[NASA]] |date=1981-10-15 |orig-date=1981-06-16/18 |id=02155, N82-13721, 82N13721, 19820005848, JPL 81-95 |pages=655–667 |url=https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19820005848/downloads/19820005848.pdf<!-- https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19820005848.pdf http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19820005848 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19820005848 --> |access-date=2018-09-22 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220130063534/https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19820005848/downloads/19820005848.pdf |archive-date=2022-01-30}} [https://books.google.com/books?id=dHZKAQAAMAAJ Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference on Manual Control: University of California, Los Angeles, June 16-18, 1981] (13 of 702 pages)
Line 288:
* {{cite journal |title=The machine inside the machine: Users' models of pocket calculators |author-first=Richard M. |author-last=Young |date=July 1981 |journal=[[:d:Q15759804|International Journal of Man-Machine Studies]] |issn=0020-7373 |volume=15 |issue=1 |doi=10.1016/S0020-7373(81)80023-5 |pages=51–85}} (35 pages)
* {{cite book |title=Adaptive Control of Ill-Defined Systems |chapter=Artificial Intelligence: Conceptual Models of Ill-Defined Systems |author-first=Richard M. |author-last=Young |editor-first1=Oliver Gordon |editor-last1=Selfridge |editor-link1=Oliver Gordon Selfridge |editor-first2=Edwina L. |editor-last2=Rissland |editor-link2=:d:Q97961494 |editor-first3=Michael Anthony |editor-last3=Arbib |editor-link3=Michael Anthony Arbib |edition=1st illustrated |date=1984 |series=NATO Conference Series (NATOCS, volume 16); II Systems Science (SYSC) |lccn=83-17699 |isbn=978-1-4684-8943-9 |doi=10.1007/978-1-4684-8941-5 |publisher=[[Plenum Press]], [[Plenum Publishing Corporation]] / Springer |publication-place=New York & London |___location=University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA; MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge, UK |pages=165–176 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=e5XuBwAAQBAJ |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=e5XuBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA165 |access-date=2022-12-26}} (12 pages)
* {{cite journal |title=Calculator logic: when and why is RPN superior to algebraic? |author-first1=Errol |author-last1=Hoffman |author-first2=Patrick |author-last2=Ma |author-first3=Jason |author-last3=See |author-first4=Chee Kee |author-last4=Yong |author-first5=Jason |author-last5=Brand |author-first6=Matthew |author-last6=Poulton |journal=[[Applied Ergonomics]] |issn=0003-6870 |eissn=1872-9126 |publisher=[[Elsevier Science Ltd.]] |volume=25 |issue=5 |date=1994 |doi=10.1016/0003-6870(94)90048-5 |pages=327–333}}
* {{cite web |title=In our AP c++ class we are trying to use virtual stacks to devlop a infix to postfix calculator transalator. To study how exactly the infix notation and postfix notation differ we used on of the very old HP calculators. I was wondering that when you worked for HP did you help devlop some postfix calculators? Do you prefer infix notation or postfix? |editor-first=Stephen Gary "Woz" |editor-last=Wozniak |editor-link=Stephen Gary Wozniak |date=2012 |orig-date=2000-02-13 |work=woz.org |department=Letters-General Questions Answered |url=http://archive.woz.org:80/letters/general/57.html |access-date=2023-09-23 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121104143556/http://archive.woz.org:80/letters/general/57.html |archive-date=2012-11-04 |quote=[…] Our marketing department had a card with a monstrous formula to demonstrate how powerful our calculators were and what postfix calculation was capable of. They challenged people to solve it on a slide rule the normal way. Well, we could all solve it on our [[HP calculator]]s but it took a few tries to get the steps accurate enough […] Finally [[Texas Instruments]] introduced an infix 'algebraic entry' scientific calculator. […] We were all […] laughing at the arithmetic entry as being too weak for engineers. […] our big formula challenge […], sure that nobody could ever do it with the TI calculator. A challenge went up for someone to try. After a short silence I said that I'd try. […] My colleagues couldn't believe it. I told them that you just copy the formula from left to right but not one of them could see through their postfix fog. After all, these were the calculator experts of the world. They are well accustomed to thinking ahead and analyzing an expression to come up with the order of steps to take on an HP postfix calculator, and they had to remember which sub-expressions were in what order on the calculator's stack. None of them could do what I had done, forget that they have to be smart. […]}}
* {{cite web |title=RPN or DAL? A brief analysis of Reverse Polish Notation against Direct Algebraic Logic |author-first=James |author-last=Redin |date=2005-02-12 |orig-date=1997-10-05 |url=http://www.xnumber.com/xnumber/rpn_or_adl.htm |access-date=2015-09-12 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170624164945/http://www.xnumber.com/xnumber/rpn_or_adl.htm |archive-date=2017-06-24}}
|