Content deleted Content added
पाटलिपुत्र (talk | contribs) →Champollion's breakthroughs: more precise description, partially adapted from Caylus vase |
पाटलिपुत्र (talk | contribs) /* ce |
||
Line 183:
====Confirmation of the antiquity of phonetical hieroglyphs====
[[File:Tableau Général des signes et groupes hieroglyphiques No 125 (color).jpg|thumb|right|Hieroglyphic and [[cuneiform]] spellings of the name of [[Xerxes I]] on the [[Caylus vase]], copied in ''Précis du système hiéroglyphique'']]
Over the next few months Champollion applied his hieroglyphic alphabet to many Egyptian inscriptions, identifying dozens of royal names and titles. During this period Champollion and the orientalist [[Antoine-Jean Saint-Martin]] examined the [[Caylus vase]], which bore a hieroglyphic cartouche as well as text in [[Persian cuneiform]]. Guesswork from the time of [[Georg Friedrich Grotefend]] (1802) suggested that the cuneiform inscription on the vase contained the name of [[Xerxes I]], a king of the [[Achaemenid Empire]] in the fifth century BC whose realm included Egypt, but any proof of the reading had remained elusive. Champollion confirmed that his reading of the identifiable signs in the cartouche matched Xerxes's name, providing the first external confirmation of the [[decipherment of cuneiform]].{{sfn|Pope|1999|pp=72–74}} This finding also strengthened the evidence that phonetic hieroglyphs were used before Greek rule in Egypt.{{sfn|Pope|1999|pp=72–74}} Various scholars had expressed doubts regarding the existence of phonetical hieroglyphs before the time of the Greeks and the Romans in Egypt, especially since Champollion had only proved his phonetic system on the basis of the names of Greek and Roman rulers found in hieroglyphs on Egyptian monuments.<ref name="RA"/><ref name="JFC225">{{cite book |last1=Champollion |first1=Jean-François (1790-1832) Auteur du texte |title=Précis du système hiéroglyphique des anciens Égyptiens, ou Recherches sur les éléments premiers de cette écriture sacrée, sur leurs diverses combinaisons, et sur les rapports de ce système avec les autres méthodes graphiques égyptiennes , par M. Champollion le jeune. Seconde édition... augmentée de la lettre à M. Dacier relative à l'alphabet des hiéroglyphes phonétiques employés par les Égyptiens sur leurs monumens de l'époque grecque et de l'époque romaine,... |date=1828 |pages=225–233 |url=https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k117252f/f266.item.r=xerxes |language=EN}}</ref> This led to suspicions that alphabetic hieroglyphs were invented at the time of the Greeks and Romans, and fostered doubts whether these phonetical hieroglyphs could ever be applied to decipher the names of ancient Egyptian Pharaos.<ref name="RA"/><ref name="JFC225"/> For the first time, here was a foreign name ("[[Xerxes I|Xerxes the Great]]") transcribed phonetically with Egyptians hieroglyphs, already 150 years before [[Alexander the Great]], thereby essentially proving Champollion's thesis.<ref name="RA">{{cite book |title=Revue archéologique |date=1844 |publisher=Leleux |page=444 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_CYGAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA444 |language=fr}}</ref> In his ''Précis du système hiéroglyphique'' published in 1824, Champollion wrote of this discovery: "It has thus been proved that Egyptian hieroglyphs included phonetic signs, at least since 460 BCE".<ref name="JFC231">{{cite book |last1=Champollion |first1=Jean-François (1790-1832) Auteur du texte |title=Précis du système hiéroglyphique des anciens Égyptiens, ou Recherches sur les éléments premiers de cette écriture sacrée, sur leurs diverses combinaisons, et sur les rapports de ce système avec les autres méthodes graphiques égyptiennes , par M. Champollion le jeune. Seconde édition... augmentée de la lettre à M. Dacier relative à l'alphabet des hiéroglyphes phonétiques employés par les Égyptiens sur leurs monumens de l'époque grecque et de l'époque romaine,... |date=1828 |pages=231–233 |url=https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k117252f/f266.item.r=xerxes |language=EN}}</ref>
Around this time Champollion made a second breakthrough.{{sfn|Robinson|2012|pp=148–149}} Although he counted about 860 hieroglyphic signs, a handful of those signs made up a large proportion of any given text. He also came upon a recent study of Chinese by [[Abel Rémusat]], which showed that even Chinese writing used phonetic characters extensively, and that its ideographic signs had to be combined into many [[Orthographic ligature|ligatures]] to form a full vocabulary. Few hieroglyphs seemed to be ligatures. And Champollion had identified the name of [[Antinous]], a non-royal Roman, written in hieroglyphs with no cartouche, next to characters that seemed to be ideographic. Phonetic signs were thus not limited to cartouches. To test his suspicions, Champollion compared hieroglyphic texts that seemed to contain the same content and noted discrepancies in spelling, which indicated the presence of homophones. He compared the resulting list of homophones with the table of phonetic signs from his work on the cartouches and found they matched.{{sfn|Pope|1999|pp=75–78}}{{refn|Hartleben said that according to an established "tradition" Champollion came to this realisation on his birthday, 23 December 1821. [[W. Andrew Robinson|Andrew Robinson]], author of a more recent biography, argues that this date is too early, given that the ''Lettre à M. Dacier'', written the following September, gives no indication that hieroglyphs were used phonetically outside the cartouches. Robinson suggests Champollion might instead have realised the extent of phoneticism in December 1822, when his work was more advanced.{{sfn|Robinson|2012|pp=148–149}} [[Jed Z. Buchwald]] and Diance Greco Josefowicz argue that there is no sign in the primary documents that the breakthrough came earlier than March 1823.{{sfn|Buchwald|Josefowicz|2020|p=422}}|group="Note"}}
| |||