Revision as of 11:12, 2 October 2023 edit BuzzWeiser196 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,803 edits →Too much unsourced text: response to Sapphorain ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:13, 2 October 2023 edit undo BuzzWeiser196 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,803 edits →Too much unsourced text: typo Next edit →
Line 108: ::UserAnita5192: Thanks for clarifying. In the interest of Wiki-harmony and good fellowship, I'm willing to concede the point. Good day to you! Cordially, [[User:BuzzWeiser196\|BuzzWeiser196]] ([[User talk:BuzzWeiser196\|talk]]) [[User:BuzzWeiser196\|BuzzWeiser196]] ([[User talk:BuzzWeiser196\|talk]]) 12:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC) : I disagree for all sections or subsections mentioned. All are easily ''verifiable'', and no specific source is needed. --[[User:Sapphorain\|Sapphorain]] ([[User talk:Sapphorain\|talk]]) 16:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC) ::@Username:Sapphorain Greetings! When you say "all are easily verifiable", do you mean that the reader should follow links to other articles to find citations that support statements made in the [[Arithmetic function\|Arithmetic Function]] article? An example would help. I am not trying to refute you. I just want to learn more about standards for verifiability. Cordially, [[User:BuzzWeiser196\|BuzzWeiser196]] ([[User talk:BuzzWeiser196\|talk]]) 10:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Talk:Arithmetic function: Difference between revisions