Content deleted Content added
→Too much unsourced text: corrected {{ping|Sapphorain}} |
Sapphorain (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 109:
: I disagree for all sections or subsections mentioned. All are easily ''verifiable'', and no specific source is needed. --[[User:Sapphorain|Sapphorain]] ([[User talk:Sapphorain|talk]]) 16:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
::{{ping|Sapphorain}} Greetings! When you say "all are easily verifiable", do you mean that the reader should follow links to other articles to find citations that support statements made in the [[Arithmetic function|Arithmetic Function]] article? An example would help. I am not trying to refute you. I just want to learn more about standards for verifiability. Cordially, [[User:BuzzWeiser196|BuzzWeiser196]] ([[User talk:BuzzWeiser196|talk]]) 10:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
: I mean by that that the material in the sections you list is very elementary and can be found in the various textbooks given as general references in the article: for instance Apostol’s introduction, the Hardy and Wright, the Landau, the Niven-Zuckerman-Herbert, the Bateman-Diamond. All the items in these sections are thus easily ''verifiable'' and don’t ''require'' each time a footnote citing a title and a page. But of course you are welcome to insert such footnotes if you feel like it. --[[User:Sapphorain|Sapphorain]] ([[User talk:Sapphorain|talk]]) 18:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
| |||