Learning patterns/Dealing with authorities for institutional partnerships: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 36:
* '''''Let them speak''''': Only give a brief introduction of your idea and about wikipedia, and then let them speak about their idea. This helps you to assess their understanding, requirements, strengths and resources and later we can frame a better and strong ideas, and better work plan. If we didn't get what they understood in our work plan, then the problems may arise in implementation.
* '''''Help them other than the basic partnership''''': After all every thing is out of human relationships we have built upon. some minute things may not come completely under our partnership, but if those institution requests us in that instance, tend to help them and make the relation more live and intimate.
* '''''Consider developing the article in wikipedia as per our standards''''': Before going for a formal meet with the organization, we've to check their pages in respective language wikipedias. We don't have to develop the article beyond the stretch of notability or other quality rules, but If the organization notability is good enough to create a page, or if you find any blunt errors in the page, then consider developing it well. ''Unfortunately some people think wikipedia as face of all wiki projects,'' they don't need to know facts and the way wiki works. So, to avoid a bitter argument try developing their page.
=== Things to consider ===
| |||