Learning patterns/Dealing with authorities for institutional partnerships: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 37:
* '''''Help them other than the basic partnership''''': After all every thing is out of human relationships we have built upon. some minute things may not come completely under our partnership, but if those institution requests us in that instance, tend to help them and make the relation more live and intimate.
* '''''Consider developing the article in wikipedia as per our standards''''': Before going for a formal meet with the organization, we've to check their pages in respective language wikipedias. We don't have to develop the article beyond the stretch of notability or other quality rules, but If the organization notability is good enough to create a page, or if you find any blunt errors in the page, then consider developing it well. ''Unfortunately some people think wikipedia as face of all wiki projects,'' they don't need to know facts and the way wiki works. So, to avoid a bitter argument try developing their page.
* '''''Don't hesitate to differ''''': Some people may start arguing without little idea about wiki organization setup. They will have fixed negative thought about wikipedia with preconceived notions. If you have to deal with such people, don't hesitate to differ with their view point. But be careful we are there to build relation but not winning argument. If your discussion is heading to a no end point, then conclude it in a friendly way. Don't ever try to win an argument with them, but just try seeding [http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Mission_statement noble mission of wikimedians] or atleast wikipedia achievments.
=== Things to consider ===
| |||