Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Actualcpscm (talk | contribs) |
Randykitty (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 15:
:::I understand what you mean, but there is plenty of time to discuss the issue at AfD; after all, that's what it's for. Nominating at AfD, at least to me, just means to create a space for a focussed discussion regarding deletion. It does not pass a final judgement on notability. Regarding notifying the creator, I do admit that that's an oversight on my part; the Page Curation script automatically notifies the original creator, in this case you. I should have notified the editor who expanded it from a redirect, thanks for taking care of that yourself. [[User:Actualcpscm|Actualcpscm]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Actualcpscm|scrutinize]], [[User talk:Actualcpscm#top|talk]]</sup> 18:45, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
::P.S. Heck, you even didnt bother to notify the page author about this discussion. A nice <s>boot</s> welcome to a newcomer. - [[user:Altenmann|Altenmann]] [[user talk:Altenmann|>talk]] 18:23, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. That the artcile was only recently created is of no importance, so a speedy close for that reason is out of the question. The AfD will run for 7 days, providing ample time to improve the article, if possible (which it is, see below). It might have been better to create it as a draft, but that's moot now. In any case, [https://miar.ub.edu/issn/0272-1716 MIAR reports] that this journal (not a magazine) is indexed in a number of important, selective databases (Science Citation Index Expanded, Scopus, and MEDLINE), so this is a clear meet of [[WP:NJournals]]. --[[User:Randykitty|Randykitty]] ([[User talk:Randykitty|talk]]) 21:49, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
| |||