Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
XOR'easter (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10:
*::Hi @[[User:Pisenberg|Pisenberg]]. The problem with those is that they do not provide [[wp:sigcov|significant coverage]] of the journal. What exactly constitutes significant coverage is a bit ambiguous, but it requires at least some prose (not just data points) and at least some analysis (from the guideline: {{tq|"so that no original research is needed to extract the content"}}). Database entries like the ones provided here do not typically contribute to establishing notability under [[WP:GNG]].
*::As a small side note, it's not necessary to include sources in an article to establish notability through them. From [[WP:NEXIST]]: {{tq|Notability requires only the existence of suitable [...] sources, not their immediate presence or citation in an article.}} So you don't need to worry about that aspect here. [[User:Actualcpscm|Actualcpscm]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Actualcpscm|scrutinize]], [[User talk:Actualcpscm#top|talk]]</sup> 20:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
<s>'''Speedy close'''.</s>'''Keep'''. A major publication in the area. The article was created a couple hours ago. As a first step, you have to place the "Notability" tag on the page, to give the creator chance to find more sources. No wonder you didnt find sources: google search is littered by irrelevant hits, and only an expert, who knowns where to look can find good sources. - [[user:Altenmann|Altenmann]] [[user talk:Altenmann|>talk]]
:Newly created articles are checked for notability as part of [[WP:NPP]]. The creator stopped editing this page more than 6 hours ago, and I don't think the argument that it might be difficult to locate hypothetical sources actually does much to establish notability. [[User:Actualcpscm|Actualcpscm]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Actualcpscm|scrutinize]], [[User talk:Actualcpscm#top|talk]]</sup> 17:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
::My argument is not about notability, but about giving people a leeway in editing. "6 hours ago" is poor argument: we all have a real life, you know. Therefore in my times it was polite to give a full day for a response. Not all editors are experts in our notability guideline, so you should give them a slack if it is not an outright nonsense or shameless promo. Personally I didnt find it notable, therefore [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IEEE_Computer_Graphics_and_Applications&oldid=192950593 I created this page as a redirect] a long time ago. - [[user:Altenmann|Altenmann]] [[user talk:Altenmann|>talk]] 18:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
| |||