Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
*'''Keep''' long-established journal, easily passes WP:NJOURNALS. ~~~~ |
|||
Line 19:
*'''Keep''' It's a kind of topic that I expect to find when I open an encyclopedia, it's distinct enough from related topics to warrant a page of its own, and we have the information to write about it. Nor is it a fringe journal; there is no risk of giving a pseudoscientific/crankish publication more respectability than it deserves. [[User:XOR'easter|XOR'easter]] ([[User talk:XOR'easter|talk]]) 22:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
*'''Comment'''. This meets the standard of "something I have heard of outside Wikipedia", so I'd like to argue for keeping it, but of course that's not actually a Wikipedia notability standard. It would be helpful if we could at least get enough depth of sourcing to clarify whether this is a trade magazine, a peer-reviewed journal, one or the other at different times in its history, or something of both. I can find books calling it a technical journal [https://books.google.com/books?id=r5o5biZPDKEC&pg=PR9], "a technical journal that almost comes into the magazine category" [https://books.google.com/books?id=tT1NAAAAYAAJ&q=%22Computer+Graphics+and+Applications+is%22], or a monthly magazine [https://books.google.com/books?id=GGdRAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Computer+Graphics+and+Applications+magazine%22] but without much detail that would help explain those labels. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 07:14, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' long-established journal, easily passes [[WP:NJOURNALS]].  <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|c]] · [[WP:PHYS|p]] · [[WP:WBOOKS|b]]}</span> 09:04, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
| |||