Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blogger's contract: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
DaveTheRed (talk | contribs) copyvio |
DaveTheRed (talk | contribs) m forgot to sign |
||
Line 2:
Unencyclopedic. Google search reveals few hits, which for anything related to blogs doesn't bode well; doesn't seem to be widely used. [[User:Mindspillage|Mindspillage]] [[User talk:Mindspillage|(spill yours?)]] 15:56, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Specific to being a student. Might make more sense in context of an article about Internet-based educational practices or something. Sitting out by itself, no. Since it is mostly an example taken from an external website, is it a copyvio? [[User:FreplySpang|FreplySpang]] 16:11, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
*I tagged it as '''copyvio''' from [http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:kRTAJ0H-Z6UJ:www.landmark-project.com/blogmeister/bloggers_contract.doc+%22Acknowledging+that+blogging+is+a+legitimate%22+contract&hl=en here] [[User:DaveTheRed|DaveTheRed]] 23:36, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
|