Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 27:
:*:I think "something of both" is also an accurate description of those: they have large amounts of editorial rather than peer-reviewed-research content (like a magazine not a journal), they are filled with ads (like a magazine not a journal), but they also have a big section of peer-reviewed research content that subscribers tend not to read (like a journal not a magazine). I would view the fact that our articles don't describe this more clearly as a bug, not as something to be emulated. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 18:05, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
:*:IEEE publishes both Transactions and Magazines. IEEE has a useful page where they define what they mean by the latter: https://magazines.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/get-started-with-ieee-magazines/about-ieee-magazines/. CG&A is about 2/3 peer-reviewed papers and 1/3 departments papers which are accepted after editor-review by department editors who are experts in their respective fields. The only ads in CG&A are conference announcements and calls for papers placed by IEEE. IEEE presently has 44 magazines (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IEEE_publications), and CG&A founded in 1981 is tied for fourth oldest, see https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/browse/periodicals/title. Twenty of these (21 if CG&A gets approved) have their own Wikipedia pages. [[User:MikePotel|MikePotel]] ([[User talk:MikePotel|talk]]) 19:46, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
:*::'''Keep''', for reasons I've stated above. [[User:MikePotel|MikePotel]] ([[User talk:MikePotel|talk]]) 20:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' long-established journal, easily passes [[WP:NJOURNALS]].  <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|c]] · [[WP:PHYS|p]] · [[WP:WBOOKS|b]]}</span> 09:04, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
| |||