Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Changed my vote to a comment |
|||
Line 32:
:*:::Second, you wrote "for reasons I've stated above", but it's not actually clear to me what reasons you're referring to. Would you mind clarifying? I think you might mean either (a) that CG&A is old compared to other IEEE magazines or (b) that IEEE is majority peer-reviewed. [[User:Suriname0|Suriname0]] ([[User talk:Suriname0|talk]]) 04:04, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
:*::::Sorry, I was unaware of the rules. I only meant to reply to the questions about what is an IEEE magazine, how much peer-review, etc. and tried to limit myself to factual data and references you might find useful. I added the vote to "Keep" the page as an afterthought, my bad. I think both reasons I gave are valid as is the fact that many similar pages have been approved, but I leave that up to all of you. [[User:MikePotel|MikePotel]] ([[User talk:MikePotel|talk]]) 20:59, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
:*::::Good point, I changed my vote to a comment. [[User:Pisenberg|Pisenberg]] ([[User talk:Pisenberg|talk]]) 06:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' long-established journal, easily passes [[WP:NJOURNALS]].  <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|c]] · [[WP:PHYS|p]] · [[WP:WBOOKS|b]]}</span> 09:04, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
| |||