Content deleted Content added
m sign a comment I missed and fix a bit of formatting |
moving forward |
||
Line 114:
There's nothing to discuss. The facts were correct as of my last edit. Taxman's specious edits and irrational arguments are disruptive to the community. I recommend he be blocked and then banned. [[User:Blair P. Houghton|Blair P. Houghton]] 19:22, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
:I think that response makes it clear where the problem lies. As asked multiple times, back up your point of view with regards to the article with facts and evidence. There are a number of people that do not agree with you on your interpretation of the exrx.net information. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] 19:51, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
==Moving forward==
The link to a review article that was recently added was very helpful. Check it out [http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbme/v10n2/en_a06v10n2.pdf here] I can't tell if it was peer reviewed, but it surveys and summarizes the results from 58 other academic papers. For one it found "In summary, EPOC resulting from a single resistance exercise session does not represent a great impact on energy balance; however its cumulative effect may be relevant." It noted a lot of other interesting results such as a few more that estimate the size of the effect and one that I had previously seen that found the effect to last at least to a small degree up to 48 hours. It also mentions lipid metabolism effects of strength training. Some studies found greater utilization of fat for energy production (as a percentage of total energy use it seems, not necessarily greater total energy use), but one by Melanson "demonstrated that 24-h fat oxidation (measured in a calorimetry chamber) was not statistically different between days when subjects performed aerobic or resistance exercises and no exercise, the control situation." I will try to work these into the draft or regular article when I get a chance, but anyone else feel free. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] 18:07, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
| |||