Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:41, 19 October 2023

Revision as of 08:05, 21 October 2023

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

===[[:IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications]]===

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''redirect'''‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to [[List of IEEE publications]]. I have no objection to some content being merged over but we can't override notability requirements based on an essay that hasn't got wide community acceptance. [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] ^{''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''} 08:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

===[[:IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications]]===

<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>

:{{la|1=IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 October 13#{{anchorencode:IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1179938576/cur|edits since nomination]])

Line 43 ⟶ 48:

*:In the case of this page, you've stumbled precisely into the most controversial case: an article that seems not to meet [[WP:GNG]] (a guideline), but does meet the criteria in [[WP:NJOURNALS]] (an essay). Arguments for keeping include (a) that the article ''does'' meet [[WP:GNG]] after all (such as via the criteria in [[WP:NJOURNALS]]) or (b) that having this stand-alone article improves the encyclopedia, so we should [[WP:IAR|ignore all rules]] and keep this article despite the fact that it doesn't meet [[WP:GNG]]. Perhaps obviously, both of these types of arguments are controversial (because ultimately it means holding articles like this to a lower or different standard than other articles). Hope this is useful context! [[User:Suriname0|Suriname0]] ([[User talk:Suriname0|talk]]) 16:53, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

*::Thank you [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Suriname0 Suriname0]. This explanation is very helpful. [[User:Pisenberg|Pisenberg]] ([[User talk:Pisenberg|talk]]) 06:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>