Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/March 2007: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:07, 27 March 2007

Revision as of 05:23, 27 March 2007

Line 13:

*May I suggest that {{cl|architectural style stubs}} would follow the language of the permcat a tad better? And be a sensible category name, to boot? [[User:Alai|Alai]] 02:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

**Sure. I can be more sensible. Thank you [[User:Goldenrowley|Goldenrowley]] 03:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

{{sfd bottom}}

==={{tl|Civil-engineering-stub}}===

{{sfp create}}

This is a parallel to {{tl|mech-engineering-stub}}, which I discovered improperly applied to a civil engineering stub article. Perusing {{tl|engineering-stub}}s, I can find about 30 articles which would definitely belong in civil engineering stubs, and there are probably more which aren't tagged as engineering-stubs, including some number of {{tl|geology-stub}}s I've already created the stub type and added one article to it, before I ran across the proposal procedure. If this isn't approved, I'll delete the stub type. <span style="font-family:serif;font-size:120%">'''[[User:Argyriou|Αργυριου]]''' [[User talk:Argyriou|(talk)]]</span> 22:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

: '''weak support'''. Would need 60 existing stubs and a little cleanup in the template and category, but otherwise sounds like reasonable idea. [[User:Monni1995|Monni]] 22:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

:Support the template, upmerged if it doesn't prove populable to north of 50, at the very least. [[User:Alai|Alai]] 23:56, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

::Maybe there is 60 if we recategorize the things I've stubbed with {{tl|industrial-design-stub}} and pick up some stragglers found in architecture and in design? please forgiveme if I have accidentally confused several occupations in making this proposal. [[User:Goldenrowley|Goldenrowley]] 02:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC)...considering my history you might wonder why I want to do away with industrial design stub so soon. Because I searched hard, but I only found a few articles on industrial design and it has no career path. [[User:Goldenrowley|Goldenrowley]] 03:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

:::Between base engineering stubs, architecture stubs which are about engineering, geology stubs which are either more about engineering or are both, and your suggested industrial design stubs, I think I should be able to tag 60 articles fairly quickly, when I have time to go stub-hunting. <span style="font-family:serif;font-size:120%">'''[[User:Argyriou|Αργυριου]]''' [[User talk:Argyriou|(talk)]]</span> 21:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

::Then I '''SUPPORT!''' with upmerge the industrial design stubs into the Civil E. category. [[User:Goldenrowley|Goldenrowley]] 20:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Got 62 articles into the stub category on a quick trawl through {{tl|engineering-stub}} and {{tl|geology stub}}. <span style="font-family:serif;font-size:120%">'''[[User:Argyriou|Αργυριου]]''' [[User talk:Argyriou|(talk)]]</span> 20:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

:For the record the category proposed is {{cl|Civil engineering stubs}} [[User:Goldenrowley|Goldenrowley]] 04:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

{{sfd bottom}}