Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
delete or redirect |
|||
Line 52:
*:For any new contributors to this discussion, the original close was: "I have no objection to some content being merged over but we can't override notability requirements based on an essay that hasn't got wide community acceptance." [[User:Suriname0|Suriname0]] ([[User talk:Suriname0|talk]]) 20:05, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
*::I don't want to distract down a procedural rathole, but I don't really agree with this presentation of policy. There are reasons other than ILIKEIT to !vote keep here. [[User:SnowFire|SnowFire]] ([[User talk:SnowFire|talk]]) 05:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
*:::To be clear, ''I'' don't see a reason to vote keep other than ILIKEIT, which is what my comment said. Other keep arguments presented here are unconvincing to me. [[User:Suriname0|Suriname0]] ([[User talk:Suriname0|talk]]) 16:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
* '''Keep'''. I say this as someone who is a fan of applying GNG very broadly, and thinking certain subject-specific notability guidelines were ''wildly'' overinclusive (e.g. the old NSPORTS one). However... while they're not that deep, sources do exist. And if there's ever an exception to GNG where a broader inclusion criteria is merited, it's precisely formal academia-esque stuff where the chances of getting gull'd by bored high schoolers or people promoting their business is very low. [[WP:NPROF]] is more inclusive than GNG partially to avoid getting razzed for a "[[Donna Strickland]] doesn't have an article" and journals are a close kin, so I'm fine with something like NJOURNALS being broader than GNG. This particular topic isn't a paper-mill journal or a completely minor journal, so seems fine to me. [[User:SnowFire|SnowFire]] ([[User talk:SnowFire|talk]]) 05:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
* '''Delete'''. [[WP:NJOURNALS]] is an essay, one that its supporters consistently refuse to try to get promoted to a guideline, which speaks volumes about the level of support it has among the broader community. Without an SNG we default back to [[WP:GNG]], and this article clearly fails that criteria - to keep this article would be a clear [[WP:LOCALCONSENSUS]] violation. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 11:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
| |||